🚀 Join our AI Wargame at Black Hat Asia and our Workshop + Wargame at NDC Sydney .

SecDim vs Compliance Training

Compliance training proves attendance. SecDim proves capability. Here's how the two approaches differ — and what each one lets you report to the board.

Side by side

What Each Approach Actually Delivers

Compliance trainingSecDim
FormatVideos, slides, multiple-choice quizzesReal vulnerable applications in a wargame — find, hack, fix
Skill formedRecognition of terms and policiesApplied secure coding capability, earned under adversarial pressure
EngagementMandated; completed to clear the checkboxIntrinsic; developers return to compete and rank
Evidence producedCompletion percentage and quiz scoresVerified fixes, SecDim Grades, Risk Quadrants by team
Compliance reportingAttendance attestationsTailored auditor and board reports backed by operational proof
AI-era coverageRarely updated for LLM risksPrompt injection, OWASP LLM Top 10, insecure MCP servers in real apps

The problem with proving attendance

Most security incidents trace back to predictable coding weaknesses that compliance modules describe but never exercise. Teams pass the quiz, ship the same bug classes sprint after sprint, and the training budget produces a certificate instead of a capability.

What to measure instead

Repeated bug class reduction, exploit resistance, remediation quality, and benchmarked team grades. SecDim produces these from real developer actions — so what you report is what actually happened.

FAQ

Does SecDim still satisfy compliance requirements?

Yes. SecDim produces tailored reports for auditors and compliance frameworks — but the evidence comes from developers actually finding, exploiting, and fixing vulnerabilities, not from watching videos.

Why do completion rates mislead?

A completion percentage tells you who clicked through a module. It says nothing about whether a developer can catch a vulnerability before it ships. Capability metrics measure what actually happened in code.

Is wargame-based training harder to roll out?

No. SecDim challenges run in the browser or the developer's own IDE with zero environment setup, and pathways can be assigned by team, role, or vulnerability class.

How do I compare the two approaches in a pilot?

Pick one team, define success criteria such as repeated bug class reduction and remediation quality, run a SecDim pilot alongside your existing program, and compare the evidence each produces. Book a demo to scope it.

See the difference

Replace Attendance With Capability

See how a wargame-based program measures up against your current compliance training — with evidence you can put in front of the board.