AI writes code. Can your developers secure it?
SecDim builds teams that catch what AI misses — with capability you can measure, benchmark, and report to the board.
1 every
7.4 min
A new software vulnerability published in 2026.1cve.icu; cveforecast.org, 2026
31%
Of breaches now start with software exploitation.2Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report, 2026
Up to 100×
More expensive to fix a security flaw after release than during the design.3IBM Systems Sciences Institute; NIST, 2002
Measure and report capability
See your team's benchmarked SecDim Grade against other companies, and generate tailored reports for the board, auditors, and compliance using the SecDim MCP Server.
Attack & defence, not tutorials
The only platform that trains secure coding through real adversarial pressure, not gamified checkboxes.
Built for the AI era
Prompt injection, the OWASP LLM Top 10, insecure MCP servers — in real apps, where AI can't just hand over the fix.
Ownership, not compliance theatre
We present security as an engineering challenge, not a checkbox module — so your team takes ownership of the security of their own code.
Fits your team's stack
In-repository content, no forced tools or unfamiliar interfaces — plus integrations with SAST, DAST, and other DevSecOps tooling your team already uses.
Host a private wargame
A private in-company event with customisable attack and defence scenarios tailored to your team and stack.
Mapped to security frameworks
SecDim courses and challenges align with SOC 2 & ISO 27001, OWASP, NIST, PCI DSS, ASD Essential 8, and CMMC requirements.
Custom enterprise reports with MCP
Gen 1Quiz / video | Gen 2Simulated snippet | Gen 3Cloud labs | Gen 4Wargame | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Environment | Multiple-choice, no code | Fake in-browser editor | Hosted lab environment | Real git, your own IDE or sandbox |
| Learning model | Watch, then recall | Guided, hand-held steps | Follow the walkthrough | Find, hack, fix — try, fail, pivot |
| Skill formed | Recognition only | Explicit, prompted | Explicit, scripted | Implicit, earned under pressure |
| Engagement | Mandated, forced | Low, checkbox | Moderate | Intrinsic — devs return to rank up |
| Proof produced | Completion % | Pass/fail | Assessment score | SecDim Rank + patch quality score |
| AI resilience | Broken — AI answers all | Weak — AI solves snippet | Partial — AI assists | Strengthened — AI is part of the challenge |
| Retention | 15–25% at 2 weeks | Low | Moderate | High — muscle memory |
Prove capability.
Not just attendance.
A completion percentage tells you who clicked through a module. Your Capability Quadrant tells you who can actually catch a vulnerability before it ships — and where to invest next.
Not more training hours. Better signal.
Skill forms under real adversarial pressure, not by clicking through slides. What you measure is what actually happened, not what was watched.
Not self-reported. Verified.
Every SecDim Grade is earned by a developer finding, exploiting, and fixing a real vulnerability — benchmarked against other companies, not against a quiz score.
Not completion. Capability.
Identify your immediate risks. See exactly where each developer sits. The conversation with your board changes when you have a Capability Quadrant, not a completion percentage.
CompetencyLow
Competency
The Defensive Cloud Native App Workshop was a great introduction to practical application security for our engineering team. The focus on real world security vulnerabilities kept the training relevant to our day-to-day work and the gamified labs made it engaging and fun. A three-in-one investment in our security posture, our compliance obligations and most importantly, our team-members knowledge and skills.
Joshua Cunninghame
Security Architect, National Australia Bank