Prompt Injection.ml
AI applications have the potential to expose confidential information or intellectual assets. When a malicious user input is perceived as an…
Train your team against the OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025. Developers harden real AI apps against prompt injection, poisoned models and rogue MCP tools — before attackers try the same in production.
If your teams are shipping AI features, the OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications is the standard they will be measured against. The 2025 edition adds System Prompt Leakage, Vector and Embedding Weaknesses, and Unbounded Consumption. Every challenge below is a real AI application with a real vulnerability: developers fix it without breaking functionality, and every verified fix becomes reportable evidence of AI security capability.
A guided introduction to the OWASP LLM Top 10 and secure coding for LLM apps: real attack scenarios like prompt injection and sensitive data disclosure, the defensive patterns that stop them, and hands-on practice on SecDim.
User input that overrides the model’s instructions, making the AI reveal secrets or act against its design.
LLM apps that leak confidential data, proprietary algorithms or personal information through their responses.
Compromised models, datasets, plugins and tool servers — including malicious pre-trained models and rogue MCP tools.
Model output passed to other components without validation or sanitisation, turning the LLM into an injection vector.
Agents and plugins granted more capability, permissions or autonomy than the task needs — including insecure plugin design.
Weaknesses in RAG pipelines: poisoned knowledge bases, embedding inversion and cross-tenant leakage.
Uncontrolled inference costs and resource use: model denial of service, denial of wallet and service degradation.
Assign these challenges to your team as learning pathways, track verified fixes, and report OWASP LLM Top 10 coverage to auditors, customers and the board — with evidence, not attendance sheets.